Select date
Huge Revelations Made And MSM Is Hiding Them – DNC Argues In Court They Have The Right To Rig Election
by Susan Duclos, All News Pipeline:
When WikiLeaks published leaked emails from the DNC showing that the DNC not only favored Hillary Clinton over Bernie Sanders but actively worked against Sanders during the primary cycle, despite Article 5, Section 4 of the Charter and Bylaws of the Democratic Party, which states the DNC chair should “exercise impartiality and evenhandedness as between the Presidential candidates and campaigns,” Sanders supporters were livid, as were some DNC donors and other registered members of the Democratic Party.
Article 5, Section 4, goes on to state “The Chairperson shall be responsible for ensuring that the national officers and staff of the Democratic National Committee maintain impartiality and evenhandedness during the Democratic Party Presidential nominating process.”
As many might remember at the time of the WikiLeaks revelation, the DNC chairperson, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who figured prominently in said revelations, was forced to step down from her position, as the Democratic National Convention was about to begin, along with three other top DNC officials.
In June 2016 a class action lawsuit was filed against the DNC and Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, by people who donated to the DNC, those who donated to the Bernie Sanders Campaign and members of the Democratic Party.
Which brings us to the present day, where the DNC filed a Motion to Dismiss the lawsuit and on April 25, 2017, United States District Judge Honorable William J. Zloch held a Motion Hearing to allow for arguments. (123 page transcript of the Motion Hearing – PDF – Embedded below the article)
MSM ACTIVELY HIDING THE TRUTH FROM REGISTERED DEMOCRATS
Every single registered Democrat and each and every person that donates even $1 to the DNC or to any Democratic candidate in a primary, should be aware of what is in that transcript, since the DNC lawyer not only didn’t deny that the FNC rigged the primary, they actually argued they have the right to rig any and all primary elections.
Problem is, unless those registered Democrats are reading Independent News, (or are part of the class action lawsuit), they won’t even know about it since a week later, no MSM outlet has informed them of what was said, or even that a hearing has been held. A Google and Yahoo search under the “news category” finds that the Observer, Hot Air, LawNewz, Washington Examiner and National Review, Fox News, WND and RT, reported on it.
Anyone notice some major MSM outlets missing? Like, CBS News, ABC News, NBC News, CNN, New York Times, Washington Post?
