Select date

May 2024
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun

Financial Weapons Of Mass Destruction: The Top 25 U.S. Banks Have 222 Trillion Dollars Of Exposure To Derivatives

16-5-2017 < SGT Report 105 740 words
 

by Michael Snyder, The Economic Collapse Blog:


The recklessness of the “too big to fail” banks almost doomed them the last time around, but apparently they still haven’t learned from their past mistakes. Today, the top 25 U.S. banks have 222 trillion dollars of exposure to derivatives. In other words, the exposure that these banks have to derivatives contracts is approximately equivalent to the gross domestic product of the United States times twelve. As long as stock prices continue to rise and the U.S. economy stays fairly stable, these extremely risky financial weapons of mass destruction will probably not take down our entire financial system. But someday another major crisis will inevitably happen, and when that day arrives the devastation that these financial instruments will cause will be absolutely unprecedented.


During the great financial crisis of 2008, derivatives played a starring role, and U.S. taxpayers were forced to step in and bail out companies such as AIG that were on the verge of collapse because the risks that they took were just too great.


But now it is happening again, and nobody is really talking very much about it. In a desperate search for higher profits, all of the “too big to fail” banks are gambling like crazy, and at some point a lot of these bets are going to go really bad. The following numbers regarding exposure to derivatives contracts come directly from the OCC’s most recent quarterly report (see Table 2), and as you can see the level of recklessness that we are currently witnessing is more than just a little bit alarming…


Citigroup


Total Assets: $1,792,077,000,000 (slightly less than 1.8 trillion dollars)


Total Exposure To Derivatives: $47,092,584,000,000 (more than 47 trillion dollars)


JPMorgan Chase


Total Assets: $2,490,972,000,000 (just under 2.5 trillion dollars)


Total Exposure To Derivatives: $46,992,293,000,000 (nearly 47 trillion dollars)


Goldman Sachs


Total Assets: $860,185,000,000 (less than a trillion dollars)


Total Exposure To Derivatives: $41,227,878,000,000 (more than 41 trillion dollars)


Bank Of America


Total Assets: $2,189,266,000,000 (a little bit more than 2.1 trillion dollars)


Total Exposure To Derivatives: $33,132,582,000,000 (more than 33 trillion dollars)


Morgan Stanley


Total Assets: $814,949,000,000 (less than a trillion dollars)


Total Exposure To Derivatives: $28,569,553,000,000 (more than 28 trillion dollars)


Wells Fargo


Total Assets: $1,930,115,000,000 (more than 1.9 trillion dollars)


Total Exposure To Derivatives: $7,098,952,000,000 (more than 7 trillion dollars)


Collectively, the top 25 banks have a total of 222 trillion dollars of exposure to derivatives.


If you are new to all of this, you might be wondering what a “derivative” actually is.


When you buy a stock you are purchasing an ownership interest in a company, and when you buy a bond you are purchasing the debt of a company. But when you buy a derivative, you are not actually getting anything tangible. Instead, you are simply making a side bet about whether something will or will not happen in the future. These side bets can be extraordinarily complex, but at their core they are basically just wagers. The following is a pretty good definition of derivatives that comes from Investopedia



A derivative is a security with a price that is dependent upon or derived from one or more underlying assets. The derivative itself is a contract between two or more parties based upon the asset or assets. Its value is determined by fluctuations in the underlying asset. The most common underlying assets include stocks, bonds, commodities, currencies, interest rates and market indexes.


Those that trade derivatives are essentially engaged in a form of legalized gambling, and some of the brightest names in the financial world have been warning about the potentially destructive nature of these financial instruments for a very long time.


In a letter that he wrote to shareholders of Berkshire Hathaway in 2003, Warren Buffett actually referred to derivatives as “financial weapons of mass destruction”…


The derivatives genie is now well out of the bottle, and these instruments will almost certainly multiply in variety and number until some event makes their toxicity clear. Central banks and governments have so far found no effective way to control, or even monitor, the risks posed by these contracts. In my view, derivatives are financial weapons of mass destruction, carrying dangers that, while now latent, are potentially lethal.


Read More @ TheEconomicCollapseBlog.com

Print