A telling admission, a telling contradiction

People inspect damage from US coalition airstrikes and artillery shelling in the northern Syrian city of Raqqa, Syria, May 29, 2017. (Aamaq via AP)

Barbara Starr from CNN, was one of only two reporters to reference the Amnesty report during the briefing. Starr asked three questions of Veale, her last inquired about civilian casualties:

And my very quick third question is, separate from Amnesty International’s report, how can you ever really know how many civilians were killed by U.S. and coalition strikes, given the fact the U.S. wasn’t really ever on the ground? Can you ever really know?”

Col. Veale replied:

Now, as far as how do we know how many civilians were killed — I’m just being honest — no one will ever know. Anyone who claims they will know is lying, and there’s no possible way.”

Despite Col. Veale’s statement, the Pentagon said on June 2 that the U.S. military killed approximately 500 civilians in 2017. During that same year, the U.S. and its allies conducted more than 10,000 airstrikes against ISIS.

Carla Babb with Voice of America followed up on Starr’s line of questioning:

I’m just curious — are those strikes that were pointed out in the Amnesty report, were they also compatible and parallel with the civilian casualty reports that you guys have put out?  Are these strikes that you had already admitted to having civilian casualties, or were these strikes that you were unaware of?”

Col. Veale provided few details:

They did cite specifically from our strike report and our civ-cas report, and I can tell you with confidence that we are always willing to reevaluate cases based on newer compelling evidence. That’s what I said in my statement. As I speak, people are looking at that article and trying to correlate those claims to the strike log.”

“Bombing the shit out of ISIS” doesn’t sound “sensitive to civilian casualties”

While Veale described the indefensible number of civilian deaths as “extremely unfortunate,” Syrians are left questioning why their families had to be killed and their cities destroyed in order for ISIS to be defeated.

While representatives of the U.S. government publicly communicate their disapproval of civilian casualties, reports continues to show that the U.S.-led anti-ISIS campaigns are responsible for the deaths of thousands of civilians, many more than are reported by the government. Jim Mattis, U.S. Secretary of Defense, told reporters in March of 2017 that “there is no military force in the world that has proven more sensitive to civilian casualties” than America’s, when in fact the U.S. “ultimately killed nearly 12 times the number of civilians than were killed by” ISIS, according to a studypublished in the journal PLOS Medicine and reported on by MintPress.

While on the campaign trail, then-candidate Donald Trump bragged to cheering crowds that he would “bomb the shit” out of ISIS, a phrase not indicative of care towards civilians and local infrastructure.

Human rights groups continue to question the accuracy of the data provided by the Pentagon, and the White House isn’t doing anything to quell those critiques. In fact, in early May the Trump administration missed two major deadlines for revealing the number of civilians killed by the U.S. military and, in a December 2017 quarterly report of the number of troops serving overseas, the Pentagon omitted the numbers entirely, having only blank spaces where the Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria figures used to be.

Top Photo | Qasim Ahmed Tahan carries the dead body of his 5-year-old son, Walid, who was killed in a bombing before burial in Najaf, Iraq. (AP/Jaber al-Helo)

Emma Fiala is MPN’s Editorial Assistant and social media guru. She is also a documentary photographer, mom of two, and an independent journalist. Her stories have been featured on MintPress News, the Anti-Media, Media Roots, and Steemit. Find her on Twitter.