Select date

April 2024
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun

Disney Director Fired: Are They Worried About Being Scrutinized For Complicity With Pedophilia?

27-7-2018 < SGT Report 127 530 words
 

by Richard Enos, Collective Evolution:



  • The Facts:Walt Disney Studios fired James Gunn from his job as director of “Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3,” on the basis of some of Gunn’s tweets from 2008-2011. Though pedophilia-related, Gunn claims the tweets were mere attempts at provocative humor.

  • Reflect On:Is it possible that Disney’s firing of James Gunn was an attempt to prevent people from considering whether Gunn’s tweets actually reflects the hidden culture of Disney itself?


Last Friday Walt Disney Studios fired James Gunn from his job as director of “Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3,”  on the basis of some of Gunn’s tweets from 2008-2011 that had been deleted but have recently resurfaced.


This is not something that Walt Disney Studios would have wanted to do. Gunn has been the writer and director of the “Guardians of the Galaxy” franchise from the start, taking an obscure Marvel Comics title about a group of multicolored misfits and turning it into a space opera decked with comedy and retro music that has already brought in more than $1.5 billion in global box office sales.


Many have expressed dismay that tweets from almost a decade ago, which were meant as avant-garde ‘jokes’ gone wrong and that have since been deleted and apologized for, would be enough for Disney to fire Gunn. It doesn’t make sense to many people. And that’s why I would like to present a theory that does make sense.


What Do His Tweets Tell Us?


Let’s use our discernment here, and try to be objective. I’ve selected a few tweets from James Gunn, and let’s see if it helps gives us an idea about who this man potentially was, and is.




When I read this tweet, my first impression is that we are simply dealing with a man who likes to engage in sexual activities with young boys. I cannot see a person who did not have an inclination to do so EVER writing such a sentence. What would be the purpose? What kind of value could one get out of making a comment like this, if the person was fundamentally against this type of activity?



This tweet is really all about the sense of comfort and well-being this person felt in being accepted as someone who has a strong desire to be emotionally and physically intimate with young boys. The North American Man-Boy Love Association promotes such intimate relations. There is certainly little possibility that a person who did not have such desires would speak glowingly about NAMBLA in this way.



My first impression, again, is that this is written by a man who has a strong desire to have sex with young boys; it further suggests that he has had experience with such acts.


Read More @ Collective-Evolution.com



Print