Op-Ed by Catherine J. Frompovich

Apathy: noun
Lack of interest, enthusiasm, or concern.
Online Dictionary

Over the last ten days or so, since my computer ‘died’ (or was ‘offed’) after having spoken over the phone for one-and-a-half hours with an activist who has become a “targeted individual” (TI) and lives in a foreign country trying to get back “their” health,  I did some soul-searching and deep thinking as to what’s the real problem.

Every attempt at discernment brought to mind one word: “apathy.”  People today are more concerned with their “smart” gadgets to which they apparently are addicted than to what’s happening around them deliberately to make consumers become modern day ‘digital’ serfs –“a laborer legally bound to and obliged to serve a lord.” [1]

Who is that ‘lord’?  There are many guesses, but the most common threads are the United Nations Agenda 2030 and the New World Order cabal’s quest for a one world government to herd humans into submissions they may not even know that they are being directed toward.

One of the most unsuspecting elements probably is U.S. law and politics, which are being used like finely-tuned instruments to direct people into a homogenized existence where right has become wrong; up apparently refers to down; and most everything we have known for ‘ages’ are now being reclassified as something so unrecognizable, one hardly knows what to think or believe anymore.

Here’s a perfect example.  Do you know what a “front hole” in anatomy now is being referred to?

If you have concluded that a small handful of crazed morons control the words we are permitted to use, you are correct. The LGBT (Lesbian-gay-bisexual-transgender) community has decided that the word “vagina” is not gender-inclusive. The new unbiased designation of vagina is “front hole.”  [CJF emphasis]

Source

However, what do we have to think of when someone uses the term “a-hole”?

In this article Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, PhD, discusses what I found to be the apparent realities about U.S. law and politics, which when I realized why Justice was blindfolded, prompted me not to go back to law school, even though I was first in my paralegal class and I earned 21 credits for law school.  Plus, actually could be the turning-point toward apathy for the millions who perceive frustrations with U.S. law and just turn the other way.

As Dr. Roberts proclaims, the U.S. media are “presstitutes.”  Long before reading Roberts’ articles, and during the early 1980s, I told my late husband “I did not want to become a legal whore, therefore, no law school for me!” 

I came to realize most laws are massaged around for the expected results of vested interests, otherwise we would not have the serious problems we have today regarding the U.S. EPA, chemicals and the environment/ecology; U.S. CDC/FDA with medicine-vaccines-patent drugs; US military microwave and weather control mechanisms—U.S. Air Force to own the weather by 2025 [2]; U.S. FCC and electromagnetic frequencies, i.e., 5G untested and being forced on to consumers everywhere, etc.!

Dr. Roberts’ article delineates what few people really are able “to get,” in my opinion, except when one finally realizes and critically looks at U.S. law and U.S. politics for what they truly are; how they are used for proselytization, intimidation and control mechanisms; and to propagate real conspiracies, e.g., the CIA, Deep State and Shadow Government, I offer.  The CIA even coined the term “conspiracy theorist.”

One also has to note there are obvious double standards at law:  Hillary and Bill Clinton [3], who ought to have been in prison, were/are protected by high-powered-friends, while current federal shenanigans are inventing new legal tactics against Hillary’s biggest adversary who prevented her from becoming the first female president of the USA, an unforgivable offense in the minds of the New World Order cabal.

Furthermore, there apparently is no such thing as genuine “fairness” in the practice of law. It’s who has the power/friends/money to accomplish their legal harassment means and results. Lobbyists should be banned by law, in my opinion. 

The 1986 vaccine law [4] Congress passed should teach us the extremely sad lessons of the multiple levels of harms such laws, and specifically those laws subsequently passed at states legislature levels, can impose upon humans—children in particular, whose basic Supreme rights to self-determination regarding one’s body—and parental rights regarding children’s health—essentially are eviscerated.   

Additionally, three generations of U.S. and global kids have paid the sacrificial price of damaged health due to Congress believing vaccine makers’ pseudoscience, while collusive efforts exist to do anything to correct the health crises [5-6-7] Congress created, in my opinion.

Why are we so apathetic?

In my opinion, U.S. law has to have its up-‘n-comings just like other issues (#MeToo, pedophilia in the RC Church, etc.) are being exposed during this current purge period.  But, where are the lawyers who will step up to the plate?