from Neon Revolt:

What did I say at the beginning of this week?

“BIG” is almost always a reference to these silicon valley Cabal companies. It’s one of the markers.

And while I’ve been watching TSLA like a hawk, and expecting maybe some Twitter, or Facebook related news, I’ll admit I wasn’t expecting the salvo that Trump and Q have thus far unleashed at Google this week. And notice the post number:

…What did I say at the beginning of this week?…

“BIG” is almost always a reference to these silicon valley Cabal companies. It’s one of the markers.

And while I’ve been watching TSLA like a hawk, and expecting maybe some Twitter, or Facebook related news, I’ll admit I wasn’t expecting the salvo that Trump and Q have thus far unleashed at Google this week. And notice the post number:

Doesn’t get much more “Orwellian” than that. (But that was an easy reference).

More on that in a bit. Q first updated us on his… what should we call this list? His “YOU’RE FIRED” list?

That’ll work for the time being.

They are “cooperating” with Huber, voluntarily, or otherwise.

And he just gave us the [2] – Bill Priestap and Mike Kortan.

Let’s see how fast it happens.

Now this, I had some trouble with.

First, these two posts are a mess.

One of those timecodes is are just wrong, the youtube link was broken, and I… just don’t get what he’s trying to say.

Anyway, let’s get a real Youtube link going and try to decipher. I have it set to start at 22:16, in case the video doesn’t jump there automatically (but feel free to jump around):

This episode is from the 28th. I just watched Hannity two minutes ago (today, on the 29th), to see if anything like this would pop up tonight, and sure enough, you had Sara Carter telling us the same thing again: that Huber has not interviewed Bruce Ohr.

Seems like if there was a problem with disinfo there, there was plenty of time to fix it. And yet, it wasn’t.

So that leads me to think it’s deliberate disinfo. Let me explain, if you’re having trouble following along:

We’re supposed to understand that Sara is one of /ourgals/, one being fed intel by Qteam.

And yet… Q is also telling us here that this story about Ohr not being interviewed by Huber is #FakeNews…

Therefore, it follows that Qteam is either intentionally feeding Sara Carter fake news (or having her propagate fake news deliberately). Remember, they could have corrected her, but they chose not to.

The only possible explanation I can fathom – and it was one that nice attorney woman fielded on Hannity tonight, IIRC – was that this was to drum up support for Trump to declassifying everything, since Huber has dropped the ball so badly, and Sessions isn’t doing anything…

But that then turns it into a strategic move, and does not jibe with Q calling it Fake News/Clickbait right now.

Furthermore, any declassification by #POTUS could be misconstrued as politically motivated by the Fake News – who will ignore the real story, and attack Trump no matter what. So I have to think Trump wants to avoid declassifying anything himself, and would rather have someone else declassify.

So… is this motivational fodder for someone to kick it into gear and declass?

I… really don’t understand this point. It seems unnecessarily convoluted and contradictory.

In other words, Q…

WAT R U DOIN’??

Don’t get me wrong: I didn’t doubt Q when he said that Ohr actually had been interviewed. That only makes sense, given the context of everything. But calling it Fake News, when it’s /ourguys/ spreading it… and then turning around and use it on #Anons like some kind of “teachable moment…”

That’s what gets me.

Tonya Ugoretz is a career FBI Intelligence Analyst currently assigned to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) as Director of the Cyber Threat Intelligence Integration Center (CTIIC). She joined the government in 2001 as a Presidential Management Fellow and as an all-source analyst with the FBI’s Counterterrorism program. In 2003, she became the first analyst to serve as the FBI Director’s daily intelligence briefer.

Anon has a nice breakdown:

Whether she’s a white hat or not, glad to see she created a paper trail in the form of Obama’s Presidential Daily Briefings.

A member of the House Committee on the Judiciary said during a hearing Thursday that a government watchdog found that nearly all of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s emails were sent to a foreign entity and that the FBI didn’t follow-up on that finding.

The Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) found an “anomaly on Hillary Clinton’s emails going through their private server, and when they had done the forensic analysis, they found that her emails, every single one except four, over 30,000, were going to an address that was not on the distribution list,” Republican Rep. Louie Gohmert of Texas said during a hearing with FBI official Peter Strzok.

“It was going to an unauthorized source that was a foreign entity unrelated to Russia,” he added.

Gohmert said the ICIG investigator, Frank Rucker, presented the findings to Strzok, but that the FBI official did not do anything with the information.

Strzok acknowledged meeting with Rucker, but said he did not recall the “specific content.”

Did Strzok perjure himself here to defend Clinton?

A series of cyberattacks sponsored by Chinese government hackers earlier this year infiltrated the computers of a U.S. Navy contractor, allowing a large amount of highly-sensitive data on undersea warfare to reportedly be stolen.

The breaches, which took place in January and February, included leaked plans to develop a supersonic anti-ship missile for use on U.S. Navy submarines, U.S. officials told the Washington Post.

…

While the unnamed officials did not identify the contractor, they told the newspaper that a total of 614 gigabytes of material was taken.

Ah, okay, the picture is becoming a little clearer for me now.

Clinton sold access to her server.

China bought access.

This exposed weaknesses in this submarine’s security system; weaknesses which were exploited by China and which allowed them to copy gigabytes of information.

(For some reason, I was thinking earlier that the submarine story was a fake news cover before a hacking reveal… But can you blame me when Q is having Sara Carter broadcast fake news herself?? It’s hard enough already to tell what’s true).

There’s your hashtag: #StopTheBias.

I’ll be honest… It’s not a very good hashtag because it’s not very memorable. I don’t see it going very far, and anyway, hashtags get censored easily.

(For future reference, I would advise Qteam – if I may be so bold – to look at Scott Adam’s wonderful article about the six dimensions of comedy, and see how they can apply them to future hashtag efforts. They don’t necessarily have to come up with “funny” hashtags, but they can apply some of the same techniques to make them much more interesting and “sticky).”

But I do like the video. Hopefully it’s the first in a series?

And it looks like a subpoena may be necessary in this scenario:

WASHINGTON, D.C. –Congressman Louie Gohmert (TX-01) released the following statement today regarding the claim made by the FBI that they have ‘not found any evidence’ regarding Hillary Clinton’s serving being breached:

“It’s not surprising that the FBI ‘has not found any evidence’ regarding Clinton’s servers being breached. Like I stated to Former FBI Agent Peter Strzok in the House Judiciary Hearing, it was the Obama-appointed Intelligence Community Inspector General that discovered the breach. It was not the FBI that found it, so their statement was technically correct, but very deceptive in its omission.

When I asked Peter Strzok about this, he said that he remembered being briefed by the ICIG investigator but did not remember what it was about. That is not credible. We know that the FBI’s head of counter-intelligence, Mr. Strzok, was doing all he could to help protect Hillary Clinton. So, when the Intel IG investigator came to report to Mr. Strzok that a specific foreign intelligence entity (which was not Russian) was receiving virtually all the emails from Secretary of State Clinton’s private server in real time, it is not remotely believable that he would not remember the conversation. In fact, if he testified that he remembered the briefing, he would be potentially incriminating himself in a coverup or obstruction role.

One thing has been made acutely clear – partisan politics, sadly, are very much at play within some of the leadership at the FBI. Though Strzok and other FBI personnel were briefed on Hillary Clinton’s server being hacked, as now reported, they knew this would devastate Hillary Clinton’s chances of being elected and they were not about to let that happen.

Fortunately, progress is currently being made at the FBI and there are good people there who are making a difference. Unfortunately, the FBI’s deceptive omission in its statement reveals that the FBI has not been completely cleansed of the partisanship that so pervasively corrupted it in Washington, DC.”

Ah, my suspicions confirmed…

Not my cup of tea, but whatever helps you guys get the work done:

Anyway, this story has a happy ending:

In all seriousness, nice to see folks happy and having some hope for the future. If HRC had won, we’d all be ash and cinders right now – and that’s not an exaggeration.

Rudy’s favorite song?

That is definitely not what I would have thought, but I guess you learn something new every day!

Read More @ NeonRevolt.com