Select date

May 2024
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun

Culture wars: a child’s “medical right” to change gender in the Brave New World

10-9-2018 < SGT Report 47 857 words
 

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News:



“Gender dysphoria or gender identity disorder (GID) is the dysphoria (distress) a person experiences as a result of the sex and gender they were assigned at birth.” (Wikipedia)


“Technocracy is shaping a new world based on twisting morality into pseudoscientific ‘facts’ that demand compliance. It’s a hoax on a grand scale.” (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)


Government programs to teach the issue of gender in schools are gaining steam. “Fluid-gender” is the artificial construct used to promote these programs.


For years, I’ve been warning about the fabricated use of medical labels as a pretext for “protecting the rights of the child.”



The op goes this way:


Shift a decision about morality into a decision about the right to obtain medical treatment. For example, claim there is a disorder called Gender Dysphoria. Claim many children suffer from it.


State that gender reassignment is the treatment that cures the disorder.


State that every child has the “right” to choose the treatment—AND parents who oppose it are illegally restricting their children.


Breitbart reports on a current case: “Parents of a 17-year-old girl lost custody of their daughter for opposing her wish for transgender medical treatments.”


“Judge Sylvia Sieve Hendon of Hamilton County, Ohio has allowed the girl to be taken into the custody of her grandparents – who support her medical transition – allowing them to make decisions that will further along her physical transition to the opposite sex.”


“The parents reportedly continued to call their daughter by her given name, rather than a male name, and refused to consent to hormone treatments that were recommended by her medical team. The girl claimed she became suicidal as a result of her parents’ refusal to accept that she wanted to transition to a male.”


“’We think the grandparents are the ones who have an open mind and will … make this sort of decision best for the child’,” said attorney Paul Hunt, who represents the court-appointed guardian ad litem. ‘The parents have clearly indicated that they’re not open to it’.”


“According to the news story, the parents argued their daughter was not ‘even close to being able to make such a life-altering decision at this time’. A county prosecutor, however, claimed the parents were opposed to their daughter transitioning to become a male because of their Christian religious beliefs.”


A court decides the parents are not in charge.


The parents are denying their child the right to obtain a “medical treatment.”


Therefore, the State must intercede.


Here is another case that goes much further. The basis of the decision is so insane that most people are unwilling to think about it—the criminality is so egregious it paralyzes the mind. AND AT THE BOTTOM OF IT, THERE IS A PRESUMPTION THAT A PERSON WHO IS IN NO WAY INTELLECTUALLY OR MORALLY OR EMOTIONALLY OR SPIRITUALLY CAPABLE OF MAKING A CHOICE ABOUT PERMANENLTY MUTILATING HIMSELF/HERSELF IS, IN FACT, GRANTED SUCH A “CHOICE” BY SOCIETY.


Yahoo 7 News, Australia, reports (9/16): “A four-year-old who identifies as transgender has begun to transition before their first day at school, hoping to complete the full transformation by 2017.”


“While the child is the youngest on Australian record to change their gender, the New South Wales government has revealed ‘hundreds’ of other children are being referred to the state’s hospitals for gender dysphoria.”


“The four-year-old is reportedly being supported throughout the transition by the education department, and is part of the Safe Schools program.”


Yes, the Safe Schools program. Safe for whom?


Deputy Secretary of School Operations Gregory Prior made this announcement at a budget hearing, which presumably means the four-year-old child’s parents are receiving public funds for the sex change.


No mention of how the parents of the four-year old came to their “medical” decision. No mention of the “discussion” with the child that led to this decision.


The New South Wales government doesn’t just stand aside; it supports this madness.


A four-year old. He/she comes up with this idea (gender change) out of the blue? He/she expresses it to his parents?


He/she is supposed to understand the medical procedures and the consequences?


The doctors go along with this?


“We have a four-year old coming in today to begin a sex-change.”


“Good. The team will be ready.”


Not a flicker of doubt.


Here is the Wikipedia definition of gender dysphoria: “Gender dysphoria or gender identity disorder (GID) is the dysphoria (distress) a person experiences as a result of the sex and gender they were assigned at birth.”


Assigned? This is supposed to be some sort of arbitrary labeling that is handed to an infant?


This whole social program has gained so much steam that many people are paralyzed—they refuse to express outrage. They refuse to point out the obvious. They knuckle under. The criminally delusional parents who go along with (and urge and initiate) sex change for their own children consider themselves enlightened. They’re in a trance, and they feel good about the trance.


Read More @ JonRappoport.com





Loading...




Print