Select date

May 2024
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun

in Editorial , 221 references Ignore this thread Speeches, Facts And Fences

10-1-2019 < SGT Report 67 635 words
 

by Karl Denninger, Market Ticker:



Dueling speeches….


Trump, for all his warts, actually read off a teleprompter it appears.  He was quite focused and didn’t display any of his trademark mannerisms.  That is neither good or bad, it just is.


Pelosi and Schumer, on the other hand, dodged the existential question of the shutdown and border: The Democrats have never negotiated on the actual border and actual security.  They have repeatedly given things (such as DACA) that are legally impermissible, relying on the courts to prevent an unlawfully-given thing from being retracted.


As such there is no other way than to “hold the government hostage” to get them to negotiate.



Yes, there’s a gun to their heads.  Too bad, so sad.


But the hidden underbelly is that neither party wants to stop illegal immigration.  Where was the demand for 100% E-Verify?  Missing, of course.  Why Mr. President?  Because your buddies in the farm belt exploit illegals for work just like the Democrats do so for votes.


It’s really not much more complicated.  The President is correct that tons of dangerous drugs flow over our southern border.  While it is also true that most of them are smuggled in vehicles that pass through actual checkpoints some goes through tunnels and other means of crossing in many places where there is no wall and even less surveillance of the border.  After all tunneling tends to produce very visible signs on both ends.


It’s a “manufactured” crisis when a girl in Iowa or a cop out west is shot by an illegal invader?  Really?


It’s not about percentages when it comes to crimes.  It’s about dead people, raped women, sexually abused children and that none of those crimes would be committed if the illegals were all gone.  And yes, I said and meant all of them.


Nor is it a “manufactured” crisis when tens of thousands of people intentionally and falsely claim asylum, often bringing children as human pawns.  In the US we call that felony child abuse, because it is.


Why do we let anyone get away with it when their skin color or nation of origin is “correct”?


Nor is it “manufactured” that most of the human smuggling (“coyotes” and similar) are controlled by organized criminal gangs.  Those would be drug smugglers, human traffickers and worse.  One third of women attempting to “migrate” are sexually assaulted before reaching the border.  These are NOT reasonable, nice, or law-abiding people and we enable and make profitable their “ventures” by allowing those who come via that method to stay.  We could instantly destroy their entire business (and all the misery they cause) by passing a single-sentence law: Anyone who enters illegally will be instantly removed and is permanently barred from future lawful entry to the United States, and no child begat from an illegal entrant is permitted citizenship or residency — period.


Nor is it “manufactured” to state that these are illegal invaders.  A “migrant” asking for help doesn’t break the law as their first act in America.  If someone asks you for food or money that’s panhandling (and generally legal.)  When they break into your home or steal from your store that’s theft, burglary or worse.


The facts are that essentially all of these illegal invaders cost the people (through the government) more than they pay in taxes.  That’s why they come; we have a welfare state and they wish to steal from it.  It’s theft; they’re not entitled to anything as a non-citizen illegal invader into this country.  No criminal is entitled to keep the fruits of their crime.


Migration for economic reasons is not a valid reason to request asylum.  Not here, not anywhere.  That’s the law.  They come because they intend to cheat.  They admit their intent and that they know their asylum request is false when they state up front they’re coming for economic reasons.  And then they commit a crime by unlawfully entering the country instead of coming through legal channels to pursue what they know, in the vast majority, are claims that are unfounded and will be rejected.


Read More @ Market-Ticker.org





Loading...




Print