Like Martina Navratilova, who seems to have been explaining herself every week over supposed transphobia, these heroes were feted for achieving public breakthroughs for equality. But then they thought they could speak their mind…
Navratilova, one of the most-decorated tennis players in history, was one of the most high-profile LGBT advocates for decades, when it wasn’t a risk-free choice.
Yet, for all her public standing there are some things that she is not allowed to say – even on her home court. Sparks flew in December when she tweeted that formerly-male transgender athletes “can’t just proclaim themselves female” and use their inherent biological advantage to compete against those born a different gender.
“There must be some standards, and having a penis and competing as a woman would not fit that standard,” wrote Navratilova, who enjoyed a better first-hand view than almost anyone of the athletic gap between men and women, and was herself coached by transgender athlete Renee Richards in the 1980s.
Initially rebuked, naively she thought she could do “research” which only “strengthened” her opinions – that it was “insane” that male-born athletes were allowed to collectively “cheat.”
Then came the casting out. Navratilova was binned as representative of an LGBT organization, her views were not contestable, but “wrong” and “ignorant,” her research worthless, her outlook not just “transphobic” but encouraging “violence” against those who had undergone gender reassignment. One article compared her to Joseph Goebbels.
This is, in her own words with the time of forethought and authorship, Martina Navratilova's 'core' argument against trans women athletes.
It's a wild fantasy worry that is an irrational fear of something that doesn't happen. An irrational fear of trans people? Transphobia. pic.twitter.com/RAX3ynGyTl
— Dr. Rachel McKinnon (@rachelvmckinnon) February 17, 2019
We’re pretty devastated to discover that Martina Navratilova is transphobic. If trans women had an advantage in sport, why aren’t trans women winning gold medals left, right & centre? Coz trans women don’t have an advantage. Look up the changes that oestrogen makes to the body.
— Trans Actual (@TransActualUK) February 17, 2019
On Sunday, Czech-born Navratilova wrote a gritted-teeth plea for reconciliation, without giving up her ground. Perhaps instructively, she likened her critics to “Communists [who] tried to shut me up 45 years ago.”
We will see if she dares broach the subject in public ever again. Many of those below have chosen silence over the right to express an opinion.
Greer wrote second-wave feminism bible the Female Eunuch, but decided to get off her plinth by writing a book on rape that challenged some of the most unbreakable orthodoxies.
Last year, the Australian academic argued that no, not all rape was traumatic, nor is each rape as bad as any other, nor do they leave all women permanently damaged, nor is it possible, nor desirable to attempt to jail every man who has ever engaged in non-consensual sex.
Germaine Greer speaking on rape on #R4Today is succeeding in being factually wrong and gaspingly offensive in an impressive variety of ways. Quite a talent.
— The Secret Barrister (@BarristerSecret) September 18, 2018
In a way of perfectly missing her point, Greer, herself a rape victim, was regaled with details of horrific sexual assaults, and dismissed as a “professional troll.”
I will also happily tell you Germaine Greer about how I was repeatedly sexually abused as a teenager and tell you all about what it did to me - and introduce you to some people both female and male survivors who will make you realise how ignorant and damaging your comments are.
— Charlie Webster (@CharlieCW) May 31, 2018
From hatred towards trans people to calling for the punishment of rape to be reduced, I can't see how Germaine Greer is any different from a generic internet troll. Just yuck. https://t.co/nV31BILGxP
— Owen Jones