by Harley Schlanger, LaRouche PAC:

The following are notes from Barbara Boyd’s presentation from the LaRouchePAC Fireside Chat, broadcast on Thursaday Sept. 26, 2017. You can listen to the presentation on YouTube.

Representative Devin Nunes opened today’s House Intelligence Committee circus where the Acting Director of National Intelligence, Joseph Maguire, testified, by saying, “Welcome to today’s ‘information warfare’ operation against the President.” That was a very accurate characterization, because that is what we are experiencing, the tools of military full spectrum information warfare have been turned against the population of the United States in the continued effort to overturn the result of the 2016 election. I will talk a bit more about this information warfare later. But, as a result of this, we are now in the process of impeaching the President. It’s our job to make this backfire and to recruit Americans to the perspective of Lyndon LaRouche, which is the route out of this mess.

Tonight, I will paint in broad strokes what is now emerging and then we can discuss what we need to do about it, because it is, I assert, the responsibility of everyone on this call to ensure that this Republic survives. Think about the alternatives to Donald Trump and where they stand, think about the sedition which we have experienced over the last three years, and tell me that now is not the time where Lyn reaches down from where he resides and helps us to help this President by getting significant individuals in the United States to think like LaRouche. It is only that kind of thinking and the political programs which flow from it, not reactions to the daily news cycle, which will heal the divisive wounds now being inflicted on this population. What is upon us is a declaration by the Democratic House of Representatives that nothing in this nation will get done until the election in 2020, that is, unless the Democrats are forced by the population to back off. That includes Project Artemis and anything big or essential to the country. It is possibly the most seditious moment we have ever encountered in our storied history.

So, the facts, and their background:

Fact (1). The financial system, centered in the City of London and, to a lesser extent, Wall Street is fatally flawed as Lyndon LaRouche demonstrated repeatedly in his triple curve function. To maintain power the international oligarchy which benefits from this system, has decided to promulgate an outright myth, centered on global warming, to induce populations, like lemmings, to kill themselves by denying themselves the means to reproduce themselves. This is not new. Their plans, in the form of an alternative to the U.S. dollar in the form of a world-wide digital currency, controlled in its issuance by the world’s central banks, are the same as the various SDR basket of currency proposals made by the IMF for a very long time. When LaRouche proposed an International Development Bank in answer to the fatal 1971 takedown of the Bretton Woods system, the City of London answered him directly with their SDR program. They told LaRouche then, we have ample means, in addition, to corrupt Third World leaders, to prevent the massive physical development of the earth and exploration of space you propose, even though we know that your proposals will work. We are seeing now, internationally, simple new iterations of that fundamental fight.

Lyn told us already how to counter them. If they seek to attack the dollar, the President needs to raise interest rates here as Lyndon LaRouche outlined in his two tier credit system. We also need such a two tier system mechanism here to ensure that low interest long term credit is available for productive physical investment, as in infrastructure and space, and that speculative finance is dried out by making extensions of credit to it hugely expensive. That is what is implied by Glass Steagall and the National Bank or similar mechanism. When they talk about green and sustainable development, hit them back with Lyn’s crash program development of fusion power and space exploration, adopt the policies favoring advanced hard goods production and high technology and scientific training. Whatever brainwashing the banks have been able to do in the developing sector, there is no true market for sustainable development in the U.S. For the most part, the insane Greta is seen for what she is, an actress in a bad movie in which the Catholic priest, who was obtained to do the exorcism, has seemingly fled the scene. The public laughs at her and searches, again for yet another exorcist, while John Kerry and similar oafs pretend to take her seriously.

Fact (2). Donald Trump’s UN Speech launched a thorough attack on globalization and in favor of nation states and national sovereignty. Globalization is the means for implementing the intended new, criminal, central banker’s dictatorship. The President highlighted the essential role of the nation state in any true advance of human civilization. The President’s speech occurred in this strategic context I just outlined. Yes, he said some stupid things in addition but this was his major theme and has been his major theme. He also accurately characterized Ukraine as the buffer state between Russia the UK, which is both accurate and somewhat hilarious.

Fact (3). Over the course of the summer, the President fired the Director of National Intelligence, Dan Coats, and his hyper active assistant Sue Gordon along with John Bolton. The alarm about this was heralded by Politico on September 18-19, with stories saying the President was freeing himself to run his own foreign policy, that he was an administration of One when it came to foreign affairs. Fundamentally, the President differs with official Washington on war and peace. They have tried to get him into a war, endlessly, the last being with Iran and he has resisted.

Fact (4). Now, with it becoming clear to the population that Joe Biden’s brain is made of Swiss cheese and that after Biden, the field of Democrats are not going to cut it, the present impeachment scam was cooked up. Remember, the oligarchy’s spokesman, the British House of Lords, have already instructed their assets in the United States that under no circumstances can Donald Trump have a second term. This scandal involves Ukraine. It involves a lot of the spies who were at the White House under John Bolton’s tutelage at the National Security Council. Both issues have huge boomerang potentials as has been pointed out by many, but it’s up to us to make sure that the boomerang results in truly draining the swamp. Pulling the Ukraine string on this can and will result in felling all the trees in this proverbial forest but only if we focus and do our job. Specifically, Trump’s reference to Ukraine having access to the CrowdStrike server or a copy of it is what caused the intelligence community’s collective head to explode. The New York Times of today instructs us that the whistleblower in this case is, indeed, a CIA agent and apparently active concerning Ukraine. He is, in other words, a witting participant in the coup and has been for a long time. Bill Binney said tonight he is a hearsay blower who is not a true whistleblower and is perverting the protections under the whistleblower law.

Fact (5). Before going to the specifics of what is before us, I want to exploit some ironies and add some reflections. The President said that the ridiculous graft of Joe Biden’s son in Ukraine and what he had heard about the firing of the prosecutor on that case, would be interesting for the Ukrainians to explore. He also asked for help on the vast Ukrainian end of the criminal state actions, led by the UK, against his presidential campaign. In the conversation at issue, with the President of Ukraine, President Trump almost quotes our dossier directly: the President says, that the coup against him started with Ukraine. Now, I ask you, who else says this? The House suggests that the President is using his office for his own political benefit. Yet, the same House has been engaged, for three years, on the taxpayers’ dime, trying to reverse the results of the 2016 elections through knowingly bogus investigations of the President. The same House, in the name of the Constitution says they are entitled to transcripts of the President’s conversations with foreign leaders, conversations which are privileged under Article II of the Constitution. What foreign leader is going to speak with Trump if everything said is going to be leaked?

Read More @ LaRouchePAC.com