from Neon Revolt:

It’s been difficult for me to write about #QAnon for some time now.

When I started this site, I never expected it to dovetail with the #QMovement quite like it has. And who could have possibly predicting such at thing? I was just an angry /pol/lack exiled from Facebook, looking to assert my presence online in a censorship-free environment. I was frustrated with the deplatforming that was going on, and was determined to start publishing my content in an arena where I had total control over what I posted – even if that meant I had to build the platform to make it happen myself. I covered all manner of Anon-related topics; not just Q. I started to cover Q because it, like so many other conversations, were happening in the world Anons occupied. I had no idea this Q thing was going to grow like it has, nor did I fully realize the vast implications Q would have on the world at the time when I first built this site. Truly, it was a confluence of being in the right place, at the right time.

I was simply pursuing what interested me, personally, and pouring that out to the world, in the best way I knew how. And in a weird way, I suppose I was searching for some kind of hope for the future. Anyone who read my book knows that, frankly, I didn’t have much at the time. I, like so many others, was swept up in the cultural drama – looking for a solution, a way out. And the more I began to dive into what Q was saying, I realized that Q offered that, in some sense – or at least, in a greater degree than anything else. In my mind, if the world was going to come crumbling down all around us, I at least owed it to myself and everyone else to give what Q was saying a shot. Nothing to lose, right? Things at the end of the Obama era had gotten so bad, I figured either we all die in the Great Boogaloo, or we can give Q a shot. If this whole Q-thing works, all the better. And if it doesn’t, well… at least we gave it the old college try. Or so spirals the logic.

But – I almost hate to admit this, and undoubtedly this will be used by naysayers against me – I’m not sure I’m really interested in Q any more.

Okay, let me qualify what I mean by that radical statement, before this goes off the rails.

I used to do these articles where I would go through the drops – almost in a rote fashion – and try to present any relevant analysis either I or other Anons could provide. It was my way of trying to help make some of the research that was going on more accessible to the broader population. And for a while, that “worked.” It felt right, and natural to approach things that way. But over time, that feeling faded. The drops seemingly became more repetitive and granular (not that that’s a bad thing – but it doesn’t make writing fresh articles easier). I’m reminded of that time Q posted all the #FLAGSOUT drops, reposting all these photos from Twitter. That’s great and all, but… what do I have to add to it? The answer? Nothing.

And I’ve never been a fan of “adding to the noise.” These an old Switchfoot song that’s stuck with me through the years for one line, where the singer goes “If we’re adding to the noise, turn off this song.” Well, that’s the way I’ve long felt about my writing. I didn’t want to add to the noise. I wanted to contribute actual value and move the needle in some tangible way. And the only real way I know how to do that is if information is hitting me fresh; where it excites the dendrites and I get to pass on the latest revelations to others who may not know how to dig up this stuff on their own, or who might otherwise lack the time.

And in a unique way, it worked (for the most part), I think. Why was this? Well, I think it was because I approached it like a job when, frankly, I didn’t have one.

After all, Q recently posted, in #QDrop 3751:

How does the average person, who is under constant financial stress (by design), find time to research and discern fact v fiction?

Majority of people more prone to believe someone in power sitting behind a big brand ‘news’ name?

So while others were working in their normal jobs, I was sitting at my computer, absorbing everything I could, giving me the background needed to really hit the ground running early on. In essence, my work became a way for people with normal lives to better understand what was happening – and I’m more than happy to have been able to provide that for people.

But after over two years of publishing articles in that style… I don’t want to say that the format has entirely lost its luster (because it’s still very much an effective communication tool), but it’s almost felt like things have really shifted in the past few months. And that shift requires something quite a bit different from me.

I’ve actually done this several times now – where I shift tactics and formats in order to better address the challenges at hand. One of the things I did, when drops became more granular, was I shifted a lot of my content over to Gab. I could have just as easily switched to a smaller, more frequent posting pattern here on my site; something like what Vox Day does, and I’m sure I could have grown this site even bigger than it’s already grown. But the format Gab allows me to post in is great for addressing the granularity of the Qdrops, as well as for interaction with readers. It’s one thing to be a lone nut posting on your own site. It’s another thing to cultivate and be surrounded by an entire community every day.

I also, of course, wrote my book – which serves a different purpose from the site. That was a tough balancing act, because I had to appeal to both old and new, as we geared up for the impending Great Awakening.

I think you take my point: different scenarios require different tools and tactics. I suppose I could have maintained a rote kind of output, where I addressed each drop here on the site – but again – I’d guess that 95% of my readers know how to use the various Q aggregators out there already (or otherwise get the drops delivered on their phones) – and if I don’t have anything of value to add to them, I don’t want to add to the noise.

But beyond all that, I’m at a point now where, personally, the enormity of the questions presented by QAnon VASTLY outweigh my interest in the individual, granular drops we’re receiving about the day-to-day political drama we’re witnessing play out – and I’m in a place, personally, emotionally, spiritually – where I feel quite alone, and part of it is because I’m not quite sure if the broader movement has quite wrestled with the implications of some of the “bigger” drops just yet.

Call ’em “hang-ups” if you need to, but the questions I have are so massive – I’ve actually been surprised more aren’t asking them. So it occurs to me that… maybe people haven’t properly grokked the implications of all Q is saying. (Or maybe they have, and I’m just being extra spergy about this).

In either case, that’s the topic I want to tackle today – and hopefully, you’ll find some value in it.

Because this has been the fundamental problem I’ve been running into with all my attempts at writing articles, recently. I’ve got a number of articles I just started and couldn’t finish, sitting in my drafts folder, because I keep running into the same issues over and over: that the enormity of the broader implications of Q far outweighs the (in comparison) minor details being revealed in Q’s drops.

(I’ve also been dealing with a pretty serious lung infection, and managing general burnout, tax season with the book, and other responsibilities, but that’s not what I want to talk about today).

To get back to the topic at hand, the implications of Q’s drops right now are so immense that – just logically speaking – it would be easier for me to walk away from the table entirely at this point and dismiss QAnon as the most effective and engaging LARP to have ever existed on the planet, than to admit he’s telling the truth… (And a big part of me hopes he’s not telling the truth, as the unreliable narrator he may be at times).

So that’s the level of #disclosure we’re talking about here. Which leads me to the obvious question:

Why haven’t I just walked away and dismissed it all at this point?

Frankly, it’s because the #Qcoincidences and the #Qconfirmations keep piling up. Why, just a couple days ago, we had two big confirmations from #POTUS himself, where he retweeted out a big QAnon account on Twitter (and long-time reader of this site, I might add), CJTruth. (The #Quisling reaction was about what you’d expect – complete with the rehashed lies about being “targeted” when the meme merely listed him and others, accurately describing the treasonous, coordinated nature of their disinfo efforts):

But if that wasn’t enough, POTUS then went the extra step and retweeted out a tweet loaded with Q-related hashtags:

And then again, today, POTUS links two more Q-related accounts in his Twitter feed:

And recall that this was all on top of a recent, prescient Q-post, wherein Q predicted the timing of Durham’s statements disagreeing with the findings of the #IGReport:

And this is all on top of the piles and piles of #QConfirmations we already have, which have been documented in great detail elsewhere.

Because, let’s get one thing clear here: while “disclosure” is part of this whole Q operation, the real goal of Q (as far as I can see) is to gather a critical mass of people large enough to effectively countersignal the media apparatus of the existing worldwide power structure. We got a hint of that a little while ago, when Q linked Jesse Watters’ recent segment on QAnon:

There was also the bit about Laura Ingraham dropping in on the boards and posting:

And Q confirming, a couple days later:

(Twitter link to video: https://twitter.com/elenochle/status/1205331292700594176)

And wouldn’t ya just know it, but as I’m writing this, POTUS tweets out a quote from Ingraham!

So, we all understand now what Q means when he says “You are the News now” and to handle this responsibility with care.

And like the Watters’ report says, we’re over 10% of the population of the US now (and personally, I feel that’s a very conservative estimate). 10% doesn’t sound like much, but that’s THIRTY-FIVE MILLION PEOPLE when you do the math.

Read More @ NeonRevolt.com