by Mark Sidney, DC Clothesline:

OPINION| Lawrence David| Those of us who actually believe in the Constitution and the rule of law are awaiting U.S. Attorney John Durham’s factual findings and grand jury indictments detailing and holding accountable those responsible for the gross abuse of surveillance laws on American citizens by Obama’s intelligence community.

In the meantime, it would serve us well to ignore the narrative engineers within the mainstream media, specifically from the New York Times (FBI) and the Washington Post (CIA) mouthpieces, who are working to lessen the impact of what is expected to be explosive revelations of political espionage arising from Durham’s work.

And, if Durham is able to secure indictments against a slew of high-ranking Obama-era intelligence officials within the FBI, DOJ, CIA, and State Department this may be the breaking of the dam that will engulf many other scandals of his administration.

These may include, but not be limited to, Uranium One, Skolkovo, Iran nuclearization, and collusion with the then corrupt Ukrainian government to help Hillary win the 2016 election.

This is the most likely reason for the rush to impeach President Trump on previously two unheard of charges and without citing so much as a single crime committed by the president.

Afterall, headlines are the most effective tool for influencing the most willfully ignorant amongst us.

Lest we succumb to the same media narratives, we should remember the statements of U.S. Attorney John Durham and U.S. Attorney General William Barr immediately after Inspector General Michael Horowitz released his report outlining FISA abuse on December 9th.

If either Durham or Barr planned on committing another cover up, their statements would not have been as contradictory. Or, they could have avoided commenting altogether.

…we advised the Inspector General that we do not agree with some of the report’s conclusions as to predication and how the FBI case was opened.”

This is the crux of the entire spygate hoax investigation. On April 10th, 2019 AG Barr, while providing Congressional testimony, said:

“I think spying did occur. Yes, I think spying did occur.

“The question is whether it was adequately predicated. I’m not suggesting it wasn’t adequately predicated, but I need to explore that.

“I think it is my obligation.”

Based on the evidence collected to date… we do not agree with some of the report’s conclusion as to predication and how the FBI case was opened.”

Eight months later, following the release of Horowitz’s last report, Barr was more convinced than ever that the FBI had manufacture evidence to spy, first on candidate Trump and then on President Trump.

Read More @ DCClothesline.com