Select date

May 2024
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun

FBI Claims Previously Undisclosed Peter Strzok and Lisa Page Emails on Seth Rich Are Redacted to Protect Investigation They Claim Never Happened!

4-2-2020 < Blacklisted News 31 374 words
 

After getting caught lying to the Courts and claiming there were no documents related to Seth Rich, emails between fraudsters Peter Strzok and Lisa Page were uncovered.


Now FBI claims these emails are redacted to protect the investigation they claim never happened.  Christopher Wray’s FBI gets caught again.


As we reported last week, Attorney Ty Clevenger reported to the courts on Monday that despite numerous assurances from the FBI that they had no information related to Seth Rich, the FBI had been caught and therefore was lying to him all this time. (See timeline below).


In response, the DOJ immediately stepped in with a letter to the judge. In this letter the DOJ claimed the FBI had met its burden and its search would have located emails “of investigative significance”:



The DOJ next says that after the Mueller sham, Hillary’s email exoneration, the Ukraine Hoax, Fast and Furious, FISA Warrant abuse and much more, the FBI is “entitled to a presumption of good faith”:



The DOJ says that the FBI was not investigating Seth Rich’s death and it has said so and there is no related case:



The DOJ then says that the FBI never said it had searched everyone’s emails and claims it didn’t identify the emails it later released because they were not “substantive” emails:



Now we can report that yesterday, Clevenger filed a motion for evidentiary hearing as a result of the government’s response:


In his response, Clevenger shows that the FBI argues that they redacted the emails related to Seth Rich that were recently found and sent to Judicial Watch because they don’t want to disclose investigative or prosecutorial activities.  However, Clevenger argues that the FBI claimed that there was no investigation or presecution related to Seth Rich – how can they redact for this reason when they claim there was no investigation?


Read More...


Print