by Theodore Butler, Silver Seek:

It has now been more than eleven years that I have been writing about the leading role that the US’ largest bank, JPMorgan, plays in the pricing of silver and gold. My suspicions that JPMorgan was the big silver and gold manipulator started shortly after the release of the August 2008 Bank Participation report, which indicated an unnaturally large increase in the short positions of one or two US banks in COMEX silver and gold futures contracts. That’s when I started speculating that JPMorgan was the big COMEX short seller. On Nov 10, 2008, I stopped speculating and directly pointed to JPM, as a result of correspondence between a US congressman and the CFTC.

Back when I wrote that article silver was under $10 and gold was around $730. Before three years went by, silver rose to nearly $50 in early 2011 only to fall as low as $14 a year or so. Gold rose to $1900 by the fall of 2011 and subsequently fell to as low as $1050 in late 2015. As I have tried to chronicle since 2008, JPMorgan has been the prime price driver in silver and gold, never losing when it added short positions and, since 2011, acquiring massive amounts of physical gold and silver. To this point, JPMorgan has pulled off the manipulative fraud of all time.

Eleven+ plus years is a long time, but it’s not just the passage of time that points to an important change in JPMorgan’s dominant role in silver and gold. For the past couple of years the US Justice Department has been openly investigating the role of JPMorgan, with recent leaks by the agency indicating it is seriously considering charging the bank itself and not just its traders with a criminal pattern of manipulation. To be sure, the DOJ is steering clear of charging JPMorgan with the real crimes I have alleged, price suppression and the accumulation of physical metal at those suppressed prices, because those crimes are so serious that it would doom the continued existence of the bank as a going concern. Instead, the Justice Department is focusing on spoofing, which has been used as a tool in JPM’s manipulation of silver and gold prices.

Still, spoofing is a serious enough market crime that the DOJ has seen fit to invoke racketeering statutes in criminally charging individual traders of the bank and the only remaining decision is whether the agency will charge the bank as a criminal enterprise as well. Since JPMorgan has been a virtual breeding ground for systematic market manipulation with its institutionalized use of spoofing, it’s hard to see how the Justice Department can avoid charging the bank as a criminal enterprise. Should the agency bring such charges, the remaining question will be the appropriate punishment.

As I recently suggested, the “perfect” solution would be for the DOJ to suspend or ban JPMorgan from COMEX futures trading for its own account and/or for clients. Such a suspension or ban would be highly appropriate. After all, that’s what is done when professional athletes take performance enhancing drugs and spoofing is little more than an illegal trading enhancing aid. Of course, there is a big difference between an athlete seeking enhanced performance and a trading practice that harms markets and participants.

And as I also indicated, the DOJ suspending or banning JPMorgan from futures trading is only “perfect” for the agency and JPMorgan, not you or I or the markets in general, as it wouldn’t undo the damage JPMorgan has wrought for more than a decade. Then again, the only parties involved in the decision are the Justice Department and JPMorgan and the solution only has to be suitable to them, not anyone else.

A trading suspension or ban (accompanied by a substantial monetary penalty) would make the DOJ look tough and would also allow JPMorgan a graceful exit and free the way for the bank to profit immensely on its massive physical metal holdings – a true win/win. The only real plus for silver and gold investors is that a trading suspension or ban on JPMorgan would avoid the DOJ demanding that the bank divest itself of its massive physical holdings. By sticking to spoofing, the DOJ escapes having to deal with JPM’s decade+ price suppression and accumulation of physical metal.

There is no question that whatever the Justice Department decides to charge JPMorgan with, the decision will be highly political. The problem with that is that the politics are unknown to most, certainly including me. Is JPMorgan and its CEO considered a friend or foe to the White House? I don’t have the slightest idea. What I do know is that the Justice Department’s investigation of JPMorgan has been highly political to this point, in that it has studiously avoided the real crimes of JPM from the start.

It’s simply impossible that the DOJ is unaware of JPM’s long term price suppression or accumulation of massive amounts of physical gold and silver. Not only have I personally notified the DOJ of the facts both before and during its current investigation; the agency was intimately involved with the CFTC’s five year investigation into precious metals manipulation from 2008 to 2013, which stemmed from my complaints about the 2008 Bank Participation Report. We know of the Justice Department’s prior involvement from the last interview by the late CFTC Commissioner Bart Chilton. There’s no way the Justice Department could be so inept and incompetent so as not to grasp JPMorgan’s crimes.

I want to be clear that when I say political, I’m not distinguishing between a Democratic or Republican decision to treat JPMorgan with kid gloves. The fruitless and compromised five year investigation came on the Democratic watch and the current investigation is a Republican affair. This transcends political parties. Let’s face it, when it comes to silver and gold, JPMorgan is a stone-cold crook that both political parties have trouble standing up to, given the bank’s power and influence.

Read More @ SilverSeek.com