Select date

May 2024
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun

If Americans Can’t Work, They’ll Need Government

24-3-2020 < SGT Report 8 781 words
 

by William Sullivan, American Thinker:



How quickly the soft tyranny of good intentions by the government becomes crushingly oppressive.  For those who weren’t paying attention, there was a buildup to state governors’ issuing orders that American citizens are to remain in their homes, leaving only for “essential” purposes, as Gavin Newsom just ordered all Californians to do.



It began with a simple travel ban, of which even progressives questioned the necessity.


Rosie Spinks, on February 5, argued at the New York Times that Trump’s travel ban with China was “unjust and doesn’t work anyway.”  “Respiratory infections … know no borders.  The virus has spread regardless of extreme measures taken by governments around the world,” she wrote.  She cited Erin Sorell of Georgetown University, who said resources would be better used in “treating sick patients and developing vaccines and other countermeasures.”


Keep in mind that back then, she wasn’t talking about a global shutdown of commerce that would kill the economies that provide the “resources” that could be better used by “treating patients” and “other countermeasures.”  The pandemic was little more than a tourism disruptor at that time, and even still, Rosie Spinks was compelled to argue that numerous “experts have said that the majority of people who contract coronavirus will experience it as a respiratory infection they will fully recover from.  But the extreme reactions,” she continued, like canceling flights and level-four travel warnings, “seem more appropriate for something much worse.”


The disease hasn’t become deadlier since then.  Quite the contrary, it’s become apparent that it is far less deadly than originally thought.



As more information becomes available, it seems that at least 80% of people who are infected with COVID-19 have mild symptoms and will recover without any treatment at all.  And there appears to be a tremendous amount of deceit in other numbers offered for public consumption.  Fatality and hospitalization rates for COVID-19 are often referenced as some multiple of the seasonal flu, for example.  But with the seasonal flu, those rates are calculated using an estimated number of cases, which is much higher than the number of instances where the flu is reported and identified.  Since we know so little about this novel virus, it might make sense that current hospitalization and fatality rates are often based upon known cases of infection, but since the actual number of infections is likely many times greater than the cases of known infection, it doesn’t take a epidemiologist or statistician to realize that the numbers being bandied about, like one- to four-percent fatality rates, are wildly inflated.


The media used all this to drive Americans’ hysteria to unbelievable heights, reporting worst-case scenarios as likelihoods and questionable data as facts (which is the most generous way that I’m able to frame what the media have done in all of this).  This was carried to social media, where emotions are intensified beyond anything seen in real life, which fostered an unreasonable fear among the public.


“Social distancing.”  “Flatten the curve.”  These phrases became the only acceptable dogma with regard to this pandemic, recited by everyday Americans with an almost religious zeal.  On March 14, Queen Millennial Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez admonished Americans for not staying in their homes as government officials had advised, tweeting:


For those in NYC but ESPECIALLY healthy people & people under 40 (bc from what I’m observing, that’s who needs to hear this again):  PLEASE stop crowding bars, restaurants, and public spaces right now.  Eat your meals at home.  If you are healthy, you could be spreading COVID.  


Not everyone was happy with Ocasio-Cortez’s scolding.  Katie Williams, who’s apparently a Board of Trustees candidate for the Clark County School District, responded to her, saying: “I just went to a crowded Red Robin and I’m 30.  It was delicious, and I took my sweet time eating my meal.  Because this is America, and I’ll do what I want.”


The tweet drew a lot of attention.  #CoronaKatie began trending, and there were countless suggestions that, by choosing to eat at a restaurant, she was “killing people.”  Almost overnight, we had reached the point of catastrophizing everyday activities.  By choosing to defy the government’s recommendations, you weren’t just risking your health and the health of others who chose to be in that restaurant.  No, you were killing people.


Government edicts began to replace the early recommendations from government officials and grew more restrictive.  We first saw gatherings of over 250 people were banned, then 100, then 10.  Then all restaurants and bars and gyms had to be closed.  That led to the directive to have no physical contact outside your family, with California’s governor, Gavin Newsom, issuing a statewide “shelter in place” order, which means I’m not to leave my home except for “essential” needs, like groceries.


Read More @ AmericanThinker.com





Loading...




Print