by Erik Striker, The Unz Review:

In recent years, Jews and Western elites have been subject to popular accusations about their secret desire to molest or hurt children.

The Q-Anon movement — largely embraced by older conservatives — is the greatest embodiment of this tendency. Q Anon is not “anti-Semitic,” nor is it on its face threatening to the actual power structure, yet prominent Jewish organizations such as the Anti-Defamation League have prioritized its suppression online.

While Q fans often occupy their time chasing wild geese and steer clear of confrontations with Jewish power, Jewish-funded Genocide Watch president Gregory Stanton recently took to the airwaves condemning the impulse of the misguided pedophile-hunters as “Nazism” and “anti-Semitism” — an accusation conspiracy theorists received with confusion and anger.

With the exception of generic and individualized implications of George Soros and the Rothschilds, there is no obvious reason for the Jewish community to find the silliness of Q-Anon to be a potential challenge.

But a deeper study into the post-war Jewish consensus (domestic liberal maximalism, suppressing Gentile authoritarianism), as well as what appears to be Jewish-led institutional preparations to make pedophilia the next barrier to break down in the sexual revolution, goes a long way in explaining the concern.

Authoritarians, Jews and Pedophiles

Numerous studies have found a powerful link between personalities that score high on the “authoritarian” scale (dislike of change, valuing stability and order, anti-cosmopolitan attitudes) and the desire to punish child molestation.

Jewish scholars have specifically singled out the “authoritarian” segments of a given population as embodying a dormant Fascism — an unconscious and potentially anti-Semitic cell that can be rapidly awakened and mobilized in a wide variety of social-historical contexts.

The Frankfurt School, Wilhelm Reich, and various Jewish social scientists to this day have dedicated much of their professional careers seeking ways to identify and deconstruct the social forces that breed authoritarian collectives and their desire to resist multiculturalism, sexual license, hyper-individualism, and even wealth inequality. The desire of Jews to prevent the rise of another Hitler underlines the “anti-fascist” creed that books like R.R. Reno’s Return of the Strong Gods have demonstrated underpins the ruling post-war American ideology.

The “repression” of infantile sexuality, according to Jews who studied the rise of Fascism, is the most consistent predictor of authoritarian tendencies. Using Freud’s widely debunked Oedipus Complex, historic anti-fascists purport that exposing small children to sexuality is the key to immunizing them from the appeal of Fascist ideas when they become adults.

Wilhelm Reich’s highly influential 1933 frontal attack on both German Nationalsocialism and the USSR under Stalin stated this explicitly:

Suppression of the natural sexuality of the child, particularly of its genital sexuality, makes the child apprehensive, shy, obedient, afraid of authority, “good” and “adjusted” in the authoritarian sense; it paralyzes the rebellious forces because any rebellion is laden with anxiety; it produces, by inhibiting sexual curiosity and sexual thinking in the child, a general inhibition of thinking and of critical faculties. In brief, the goal of sexual suppression is that of producing an individual who is adjusted to the authoritarian order and who will submit to it in spite of all misery and degradation. At first, the child has to adjust to the structure of the authoritarian miniature state, the family; this makes it capable of later subordination to the general authoritarian system. The formation of the authoritarian structure takes place through the anchoring of sexual inhibition and sexual anxiety.

Reich’s book, in non-ideological terms, observes that a strong and united heterosexual family unit that instills moral values in its children and shields them from pre-pubescent sexual experiences creates the building blocks for organic community and social harmony that populists can later “exploit.”

Sexual repression and anti-Semitism –populist opposition to unfair and destructive concentrations of Jewish power — thus walk hand-in-hand.

Reich’s communist past and seeming endorsement of sex with children enabled by the destruction of the family was not well-received during his time. While the story of the Jewish Marxist being driven out of the Third Reich and his books burned is often featured in “Holocaust” and liberal lore, less known is the fact that he was constantly harangued by the US government during the 1950s, culminating in a federal court ordering his books be burned again.

A slightly watered down and updated version of Reich’s theories were developed undisturbed by the American Jewish Committee in 1950 — The Authoritarian Personality by Theodore Adorno, Else Frenkel, Daniel Levinson and others.

Adorno et al drew from Freudian infantile sexuality theory, but did not go so far as to outright endorse molesting children to prevent Fascism. Instead, the compromise for reducing the number of individuals rating high on the “F-scale” (Fascism) was prescriptions to undermine traditional Western concepts of the family (such as through feminism), end corporal punishment, and promote sexual depravity (homosexuality, transgenderism, etc) more aggressively.

Theories by Adorno and Reich remain the broad consensus among today’s academy. The rise of white populism in Western countries and some non-Western countries has largely been contained by Jewish organizations, but with this has come a renewed interest in not just studying the phenomenon from the perspective of it being a perverted “threat to democracy,” as Yascha Mounk’s The People vs. Democracycontends, but also in accelerating social-liberal anti-social trends ahead of schedule.

The 1960s: Gay Rights and Pedophilia

Advocacy for legalizing pedophilia is nothing new in post-war Western nations. Influential Jewish and homosexual intellectual and cultural leaders like Allen Ginsburg, Jacques Derrida, Michel Foucault, Hakim Bey, Daniel Cohn-Bendit, Gabriel Matzneff, et al –fueled by Jewish anti-fascist hysterics and the theories of Reich, Freud, and Adorno — openly promoted sex with small children as an act of liberation — unimaginable in 2020.

Groups like NAMBLA (North American Man Boy Love Association) were generally accepted as fellow travelers in the “LGBT” movement of its time and were members of mainstream gay advocacy organizations like the International Gay and Lesbian Alliance (ILGA). In the UK, the Pedophile Informational Exchange was also involved with gay activism. The Netherlands, France, Germany and other liberal states all had parallel above-ground groups dedicated to lowering or abolishing the age of consent, sometimes embraced by mainstream political organizations like the German Green Party (which for years was represented by Daniel-Cohn Bendit in the European Parliament).

Read More @ Unz.com