True advancement cannot stem from materialism or detached power structures, as they only exacerbate societal disunity and hinder the discovery of unknown unknowns. The issue lies not in determining the best abstracted political or economic system, but in recognizing that they all are detached from those who uphold them, driven by a consumptive/hyperproductive force. We require genuine foundations and a departure from consumer-driven technology that supplants the meaningful and bonding aspects of life. Transhumaism and transsexuals are both rooted in the temptation of creation itself to use knowledge to circumvent the lived condition and usurp essence of the living absolutes they are a part of. Both are rooted in a whole made of the sum of its parts. Both ignore essence driving Being and Becoming, and both are a continuation from the shift into humanism which resulted from the detachment of theism and abstraction of revelation from the living chain of existence. We can advance technology and the competitive impetus cannot be removed either as much as the creative cannot detach from it, but to think we can remake reality in our own image to supplant the meaningful hardships of life is to destroy it and negate that we are part of the living absolutes as co-creators.

We need to advance technology under the control of our people, grounding us in a living chain of existence and wonder rather than within an abstracted, top-down governing and economic system. Recognizing the consumptive nature of technology when applied to living systems is crucial for understanding its place. The pervasive entropy within our system taxes the time and energy of the average person, as job specialization can lead to an excess of time for wonder but also its antithesis in excessive material accumulation, creating distance between people greater than the physical and a void that is never filled. The superfluous drains our systems, time, and understanding of reality, robbing us of meaning, bonds, and creativity. It feeds off of the life force of our creative impetus.

Human perfection and technical perfection are incompatible. If we strive for one, we must sacrifice the other: there is, in any case, a parting of the ways. Whoever realizes this will do cleaner work, one way or the other.

Technical perfection strives towards the calculable, human perfection towards the incalculable. Perfect mechanisms — around which, therefore, stands an uncanny but fascinating halo of brilliance — evoke both fear and Titanic pride which will be humbled not by insight but only by catastrophe.

The fear and enthusiasm we experience at the sight of perfect mechanisms are in exact contrast to the happiness we feel at the sight of a perfect work of art. We sense an attack on our integrity, on our wholeness. That arms and legs are lost or harmed is not yet the greatest danger.

— Ernst Jünger

The insight given here is essential after the catastrophe and cannot prevent it, but it can change its nature, either ending in a false “golden” age that consumes us or regrounding our foundations to usher in a New Heroic Age. The competitive and creative impetuses in human connection and technological innovation can be synergized by inverting the material void and rebuilding from the foundations with these understandings passed down. Scientific thought requires the creative impetus to not fall to scientism, placing an input and output linear relationship where nonlinear processes in living interconnectedness reign. By separating living systems from rapid technological change, we can better understand living systems and advance integrative sciences and technology. Grounding people in nature and organic bonds that include some level of struggle and personalization of craft allows for the wonder and creative contributions of science and meaning in life and the physical realm. The spirit is drained by the material which is not synonymous with physical matter but relating to it as a stasis outside of the natural world, which is a spiritual foil for the creation of meaning and transference of energy into living potential.

Hyper-war and AI advancement should not justify granting more control to corrupt, dehumanizing governing organizations. Remember Agenda 2030 zone is the West, Europe and Israel, so the combined competitive impetus can be enslaved to innovate. Innovating more now for the system or building within it only helps Agenda 2030. Rather than centralized structures, we need systems inherently less susceptible to hyper-war and the consumptive nature of technology. Rural areas lacking drone infrastructure and barriers to satellite data acquisition can serve as less vulnerable alternatives to high-tech urban centers. The need to compete is important, but we should not let fear of technology drive current centralization but instead need a strategic smaller implosion caused by re-attachment to cement the bonds of localities to form a stratocracy. Leadership must be grounded in what it leads, and the competitive impetus of governance must sacrifice for the life of the culture rather than being conserved with decadence and use. Separating citizens from an abstracted governing state and back to living precepts within the living absolutes of formative cultural vantages requires sacrifice for inclusive fitness. We must distinguish the realms of the competitive and creative impetuses and their interplay in a way that can foster our growth without detachment, which requires the effort of laying the groundwork of integrative sciences before blundering forward.

People regrounding into localities to pull out of this system will be the foundation of a new order. The localities will be left to a more rugged rural existence that fosters strong bonds and authentic cultures, where our Weltanschauung can be grounding in the interconnectedness of our living chain of existence. Currently our perception is limited by living in such detachment and surrounded by things in their most entropic state. Craftsmanship has our creative impetus and that of other aspects of the life and death cycle. It has the meaning of the experience and shaping between living beings immersed in the rebirth cycle of all our ancestors. Our sense perception is not made for civilization but to be in the garden of the rebirth cycle with the living stories of our ancestors, their ashes and bones part of the interconnected cycle of life around us. The method by which we live affects our perception and intuition, but in this system for many it goes haywire. There is the feeling that something is wrong being masked by the pharmaceutical globalizing oligopoly.

These localities will give rise to a conscriptive stratocracy, uniting men in a brotherhood of warrior rulership with rotating federal and local duties. This government will be for the people and by the people, avoiding the weaknesses of voting systems. Technological innovation will be controlled within the stratocracy as part of the competitive impetus, and grounding leadership in localities will ensure that technology serves a protective role and the creative impetus seeks unknown unknowns with three kings from the Life Giver’s lineage to rule as heads of spiritual matters and the executive. Technology will be limited in its consumer applications, with a focus on areas like public transport, while mass production will no longer shape society. Instead, there will be a resurgence of local craftsmanship, regenerative agriculture, herbalism, traditional healing, and other creative expressions balanced with blood bonds between localities in serving as brothers in arms and marriage across regions to unite.

No legal system can repair the bonds between people, and a balance between the sexes will require a systemic shift. In the current consumer-driven society, men and women harm each other and often view each other as commodities. Women have lost our traditional support networks to mechanization, leaving us isolated and in superficial competition. This has stripped women of our communities and meaning beyond sexual value, and men beyond the ability to provide which is easily then fallen to other means of monetization like OnlyFans. Men cannot replace the emotional support provided by a community of women, and this often strains marriages for women expecting them to do so. Archeofoundationism will help ground both women and men in communities that prioritize the balance of the creative and competitive impetuses, reflecting the complementary roles of men and women in the horseshoe of creation.

The mat(t)er grows to be able to house the consciousness that created it. Mater being turned into the material in a consumptive death/competitive impetus’s imbalance will destroy the foundations of all life and the female half of the divine. We need to organize in the image of the divine couple with the union of Artemis and Apollo or Shakti and Rudra. Mother Nature and Sky Father are a continuum. They are not mutually exclusive but a living chain of connection and interplay of meaning that balance each other. This is like the balance between the sun and earth in photosynthesis, the sun sacrificing himself in a divine union of photosynthesis to bring negative entropy to our semi-closed system, so that in his loving embrace mater grows up to meet him in the beauty of all of nature. Their holy union of sacrifice and life and death balance allows for the foil of meaning and connected changing of forms to exist. Life and death are in the image of the continual rebirth and sacrifice of the continuum of all divine forces from the chthonic to the natural to the celestial and it is within these living absolutes that we must base the processes we live by or be wiped out as a parasitical simulacrum that inverts both life and death into a stasis of forms as capable of rebirth as plastic.

The desert is growing; the faded, infertile spheres are multiplying. The fields which gave life purpose are disappearing; so are the gardens from which one can take nourishment without suspicion, the sheds which have familiar tools. The laws have become dubious, the weapons double-edged. Woe to him who harbors deserts; who does not contain, be it only in one cell, the substance which ever again guarantees fertility.

— Ernst Jünger