As long as the lie remains in our hearts,

it will not be possible to build a better world.

Michele Camposeo

Was fascism and its German variant, National Socialism, as pernicious, criminal, and reprehensible as democrats claim? Were the victorious democrats of the Second World War right to wipe out the slightest trace of these authoritarian governments through massive purges of documents and the systematic murder of several million people, especially in France and Germany? “Let’s find out,” as Varg Vikernes would say!

***

The term “fascism” is derived from the Italian word fascia, which means “the group,” or more specifically “in consideration of the group.” In this political system, individuals are called upon to reconcile their individual needs with the needs of the group (their nation). All of their actions must be judged by their impact on the group. In other words, fascism rejects the selfish, “me first” mentality so common in capitalism. Each person is expected to live a healthy life so as not to become seriously ill and increase the collective burden. People are therefore encouraged to eat well, exercise, and avoid excesses of any kind. This is the essence of fascism: individualism tempered by a strong consideration for the needs of the group. There are different flavours of fascism, but they all have the following points in common.

Economic System

In fascism, the government plays a central role in the supervision of banking, trade, production, and the labour market. This supervision has only one purpose: to ensure the common good and security of the nation. Authoritarian governments of this type are therefore a means to an end, that is, the interests of the nation and its people rather than the interests of the ruling elites and the oligarchs who manipulate them as is the case in a democracy.

The following axiom is absolutely non-negotiable: the government does not approve any business activity that does not have a positive effect on the entire nation and its people. By “positive effect” is meant: Is this business good for the workers? Does it pay a fair wage? Does it produce a product or provide a service that contributes to the well-being of the people and to the technological, moral, and spiritual advancement of the nation?

In such a system, pornography, for example, would be banned because it corrupts, exploits, and degrades people, especially women. Similarly, free trade agreements like the Transatlantic Treaty would be banned forever because such agreements move industries to countries where labour is cheap, thus greatly harming the local workforce.

Fascism also relies on free enterprise with only one constraint: Does this activity benefit the nation and the people? Within this framework, the government has no objection to a businessman getting rich, unlike communism, which is fundamentally against personal wealth, at least in theory, because we know today that in the USSR businessmen made fortunes and the Judeo-Bolshevik elites lived the life of a king while the people languished in misery and deprivation.

Private property is also allowed, unlike in communism where it is forbidden. To put it another way, if you are an entrepreneur, go ahead, start as many businesses as you want, get rich, be successful, but don’t produce any product or service that might harm the nation and its people; also make sure that your workers are treated well and are paid a wage that allows them to live decently. If not, we will put an end to your activities.

In a fascist system, employers and employees are united against communism and capitalism. Under Hitler, for example, National Socialism indeed emphasized the principle that workers and employers are meant to be together as a united entity and not to be agitated or played off against each other, unlike today’s capitalist system. Unions and strikes, needless to say, are forbidden. All this is well explained by Friedrich Kurreck, a German engineer who survived the massive denazification that Germany underwent after the war:

What can an employer do with inventions and ideas, each one better than the other, if he has no workers in his workshop to produce them? Nothing! And vice versa: what can a very good worker do, if he has no employer whose business decisions can provide him with modern technology? Nothing! The principle is that those who work with their heads and hands form a team with employers who care about the national interest.

Banks

In a fascist system, usury is forbidden. The government closely controls all aspects of monetary policy, including lending. It is the government that prints the money, and lends it out interest free, unlike a democracy where foreign-owned private banks print the money, control monetary policy, and make loans at usurious interest rates that ultimately put nations into irreparable debt. The National Socialists also practised barter on a large scale in order to avoid becoming slaves to the interest lending of the cosmopolitan bankers. This method of trade was naturally a thorn in the side of the Anglo-American Jewish bankers, for they could no longer exploit the Germans. The result was extreme unrest against Germany.

Cultural and Social Aspects

In order to keep everything clean and respectable, to maintain a high standard of morality, to cultivate a sense of honour and ardent patriotism, to prevent the spread of filth that could corrupt and deprave society, the Fascist government kept a close eye on films, theatre, art, literature, music, education, non-governmental organizations, think tanks, etc. In an authoritarian regime, NGOs and oligarchs like George Soros would be unable to pursue their subversive activities.

Status of Women

In fascism, women are highly respected. As the bearers of a future life, they are expected to be well educated and cultured. They are encouraged to pursue their interests and careers, but only if it does not interfere with the needs of their families. The family comes first at all times. They are encouraged to be strong, but feminine. In Fascist art, women are portrayed as heroines or near-goddesses.

Politics

In fascism, members of parliament are chosen by the people on the basis of their intrinsic qualities: intelligence, dedication, past achievements, capacity for work and organization, honesty, and not on the basis of party affiliation. Elected members of parliament use their qualities to serve the nation, to study, discuss and make laws in a quiet manner, and to help the government with their criticism and suggestions, instead of throwing insults and paper balls at each other. Ministers are chosen by the head of state from the best of the best, not for the sake of parity. They strive to govern in the general interest of the country, not in the interest of a handful of plutocrats who got them elected through carefully planned election campaigns by professional public manipulators. The head of state is not the elected representative of a party, but the worthy representative of the nation chosen and respected by all citizens. He serves the entire nation. And unlike a democracy, the representatives of the nation are directly responsible for their actions. Their purpose is not to divide the nation, but to unite and enrich it, technologically, morally, and spiritually. It is therefore not a totalitarian state, as the American journalist Lothrop Stoddard states in the following quote:

The relationship between the people and the state shows how wrong it is to call the National Socialist state a totalitarian state. A state that works for an end and is not an end in itself can never be called a totalitarian state, in which the center of gravity has been shifted away from the individual. In this case, the defenceless individual is confronted with an all-powerful state. But the National Socialist state exists to serve the people and thus each member. The whole is therefore called upon to cooperate in the life of the state. The term, the whole, is correctly applied to the National Socialist Weltanschauung [world-view], which is embodied in the whole people and activates all branches of national existence.

Ecology and Animals

Ecology was not originally a concern of the left, but of the conservative right, especially the fascists. The fascists encouraged respect for nature because it is the source of all life. Germany and the Nordic European countries in general are the true cradle of concern for the environment and the protection of animals, both domestic and wild. The German National Socialists, for example, had the most progressive animal protection laws in the world.

All the great precursors of the green movement are conservatives, enemies of progress exclusively turned to the useful and the exploitable and “which ends up considering man himself as a guinea pig.” As Giovanni Monastra, one of the authors of the French book Piété pour le cosmos (Piety for the Cosmos), rightly points out, even the term “ecology” is an invention of the conservative German Ernst Haeckel.

The further south one goes, “including within Europe itself,” notes Philippe Baillet, the other author of this excellent book, the more the ecological feeling disintegrates. There is thus a racial facet to ecology, with whites generally being more respectful of nature and animals than other races.

Philippe Baillet also makes an important distinction between liberals and globalist leftist ecologists, the advocates of identity without borders or mix-race advocates and right-wing ecologists, the advocates of territorial roots and race consciousness. The latter want to protect not only nature, but also racial and cultural particularities. While left-wing environmentalists are only concerned with the protection of nature, at least in theory, because ecology is just an instrument they use to satisfy their lust for power.

Freedom

If a person doesn’t like living in a fascist country, he is free to go and live elsewhere. Unlike communism, where if you don’t like starving like in Cuba, you’d better keep your mouth shut or you’ll end up in a re-education camp where you’ll be brainwashed into being a good, obedient, and docile little communist. If you resist, you will probably be executed. So, submit or suffer the consequences.

What Are the Fundamental Differences Between Communism and Fascism?

Fascism is for the concept of private property and the market economy, while communism is against private property and for an economy controlled by the government through a centralized plan. In a fascist system such as National Socialism, the means of production are generally in private hands, although the state reserves a “guiding” role. In a communist system, private property, including farms, factories or means of production, and even housing, is confiscated by the state. While both systems are inherently authoritarian, National Socialism is considerably more user-friendly than Communism. In fact, in National Socialism, citizens’ rights are respected and protected, whereas in communism, private rights do not exist.

The goals of the two systems are also different. Hitler’s National Socialism is a revolutionary movement to “protect” Christian Western civilization, while communism is a revolutionary movement to “destroy” it. In the words of Harold Cox, a member of the British Parliament and a typical liberal scholar: “The (communist) socialists do not aim at the progress of the world as such, but at its destruction as a prelude to the building of a New World [New World Order] straight out of their imagination… And to build this world they deliberately address themselves to envy, hatred, and malice, which is ethically contrary to everything that has inspired all the great religions of the world.”

What Are the Fundamental Differences Between Capitalism and Fascism?

Fascism places the value of work instead of the value of money at the centre of the economy. In other words, even if fascism is for the market economy, fascism is not capitalism. The primary goal of capitalism is profit, while the primary goal of fascism is the welfare of the nation and the common good. In a capitalist country, nothing can interfere with the maximization of profits, neither the workers nor the environment, absolutely nothing. Driven by greed, capitalism inevitably drifts towards governmental deregulation and laissez-faire capitalism. This ends up hurting workers by lowering their wages or creating unemployment if their employer decides to move its operations overseas like to China or India where wages are paltry.

Furthermore, capitalists mistakenly believe that the money accumulated by a handful of wealthy entrepreneurs will always trickle down to the masses and that everything will eventually balance out for the better. This is not entirely untrue, but most of the time it is not the case. Money does not trickle down to the less fortunate, and it is the workers and the environment that suffer the consequences.

In short, just as fascists completely reject communism, they also reject this type of capitalism that does not benefit the nation and the common good.

What are the Fundamental Differences Between the Socialism of Fascist Germany and the Socialism of Marxism?

In an article published in the December 28, 1938, issue of The Guardian newspaper, Sunday Express, Adolf Hitler says the following about German-style socialism:

For me the term “socialist,” a term derived from the word “social,” means above all “social equity.” A socialist is someone who serves the common good while retaining his or her individuality or personality, or even the product of his or her personal work. Our definition of “socialist” has nothing to do with Marxism. Marxism is against private property, while true socialism is not. Marxism places no value on the individual, on individual effort, or efficiency; true socialism places value on the individual and encourages him to be individually efficient as long as his interests correspond to those of the community. All great inventions, discoveries and achievements are the result of an individual. I am accused of being anti-property and of being an atheist. Both of these accusations are false.

The Alleged Crimes of National Socialism and Fascism

Hitler and the National Socialists, and indeed the Fascists in general, were not the embodiment of absolute evil. Many specialists know this. Only the public doesn’t know it. Do you know why? Well, since the end of the Second World War, the peoples of the nations who were involved in WW2 have been subjected to a thorough brainwashing in the media, in films, and in schools, which has only one function: to stigmatize National Socialism and Fascism while hiding the abyss of atrocities committed by the Jews and their Anglo-American, French, and Soviet vassals.

The Germans, of course, are not blameless. In any war, there is evil on both sides. But if the alleged crimes of the Germans still make the daily headlines 80 years later, the crimes of the Jews and their vassals are consciously and methodically concealed. No comparison that would lessen the gravity of the German crimes is allowed under any circumstances. The Jews, in other words, do not want to see the rebirth of a political doctrine that would dethrone them. The famous catchphrase “Never Again” does not refer so much to the alleged gas chambers as to National Socialism (and fascism in general), one of the best antidotes to political or rabbinic Judaism that deadly poison which has been eating away at humanity for at least 2000 years.

Trick 9

Fascism Is the Height of Abomination

Notes

This text is partially adapted from James L. Miller, Ph.D. “What is Fascism? Immigration, Globalization, Political Correctness: The Jewish Elites Attack on the Western World,” September 5, 2011.

Richard Pipes, Russia Under the Bolshevik Regime, Vintage Books, 1995.

Lothrop Stoddard, Into the Darkness: An Uncensored Report From Inside the Third Reich at War, Fairborne Publishing, 2011, p. 213.

Friedrich Kurreck, “Life in the Third Reich and the World Political Situation Then and Now,” Der Schlesier, July-August 2002.

Ibid.

Ibid.

Ibid.

James L. Miller, article cited.

Ibid.

Lothrop Stoddard, work cited, p. 207.

Luc Ferry, Le Nouvel Ordre écologique : L’Arbre, l’Animal et l’Homme, Grasset, 1992, p. 147-168.

Giovanni Monastra and Philippe Baillet, Piété pour le Cosmos, Akribeia, 2019.

Ibid.

Benton Bradberry, The Myth of German Villainy, Second updated, revised edition, Money Tree Publishing, 2023, p. 171-181.

Ibid., p. 171.

Ibid., p. 172.

Ibid., 172.

Joachim Hoffmann, Stalin’s War of Extermination, 1941-1945: Preparation, Execution, and Documentation, PressCapshaw, 2001.

Heinz Nawratil, The Black Book of Expulsion: The Ethnic Cleansing of Germans in Central and Eastern Europe, 1945-1948, Akribeia Publishing, 2001.

Francis Goumain, Atrocités françaises en Allemagne et en Autriche, Jeune Nation, October 5, 2021. Excellent summary from Claus Nordbruch, Bleeding Germany Dry: The Aftermath of World War II from the German Perspective (translation by E. M. Parker, R. M. Neuville & J. M. Damon), Éditions Contact, 2012.

Ralph Franklin Keeling, Gruesome Harvest, Institute of American Economics, 1947.

Thomas Goodrich, Hellstorm. The Death of Nazi Germany 1944-1947, Money Tree Publishing, 2020.

James Bacque, Crimes & Mercies: The Fate of German Civilians Under Allied Occupation, 1944-1950, Little Brown & Co., 1997.

David Irving, The Destruction of Dresden: The Night of Retribution for Nazi Germany, 250,000 Civilians Massacred by Anglo-American Bombers, Art and History of Europe Publishing, 1987.

Michael Collins Piper, The New Babylon: Those Who Reign Supreme, American Free Press, 2012.