All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author’s name (only available in desktop version).

To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.

Click the share button above to email/forward this article to your friends and colleagues. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

Global Research Wants to Hear From You!

***

In our contemporary education, a technological revolution is underway—a silent technological revolution that transcends the boundaries of ethics, law, pedagogy, sociology, and even the very essence of human existence.

At its epicenter lies the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI), a force both awe-inspiring and terrifying in its potential to reshape the landscape of learning and knowledge. As educators and learners grapple with the profound implications of AI in education, they are confronted with a myriad of challenges that extend far beyond the realm of traditional academic discourse and educational praxis. 

This my present essay endeavors to delve deep into the philosophical, analytical, and critical dimensions of the challenges posed by AI in contemporary education, exploring the ethical, legal, pedagogical, technological, sociological, existential, and even the spiritual challenges that AI poses in our contemporary educational system, while examining the implications for issues of creativity, plagiarism, inauthenticity, intellectual rights breaches, academic deception, and cheating that Artificial Intelligence may pose for teachers and students alike.

Foremostly, the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in our present educational system challenges our conceptions of ethics and of existential authenticity, forcing us to grapple with questions of “right and wrong”, “authentic and inauthentic” in an increasingly technologically mediated and digitalized world.

As AI algorithms shape educational experiences through personalized learning pathways and adaptive assessments, serious concerns arise about the erosion of student’s autonomy, creativity, originality, authenticity, genuine volition, and free agency in the learning process. The tension between individual freedom and algorithmic determinism underscores the need for ethical frameworks that prioritize intrinsic human values and human rights as well as social equity in the design and deployment of AI-driven educational technologies to students across digital and information divides.

In addition, the proliferation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in our present education raises complex legal issues surrounding data privacy, intellectual property rights, and algorithmic accountability.

As educational institutions collect and analyze vast amounts of student and faculty data to inform AI-driven decision-making processes, questions emerge about the ownership, access, and use of this data. Additionally, concerns about algorithmic bias, algorithmic inauthenticity, skewed algorithmic programing, algorithmic discrimination, as well as algorithmic manipulations highlight the need for transparent, ethical, and accountable algorithms that adhere to principles of fairness and equity. Legal frameworks must evolve to address these challenges, ensuring that the rights and interests of students and educators are safeguarded and protected in an increasingly data-driven global landscape.

From the point-of-view of pedagogy, the integration of Artificial Intelligence presents both opportunities and challenges for educators seeking to foster meaningful learning experiences that transcend the limitations of technology.

On one hand, AI-powered tools and platforms offer the potential to enhance teaching effectiveness through personalized learning experiences, adaptive grading rubrics, students’ output feedback mechanisms, and intelligent mentoring systems. By leveraging AI to analyze student learning patterns and adapt instructional strategies accordingly, educators can create more tailored and responsive learning environments that cater to the diverse needs and abilities of individual learners. However, the reliance on AI also raises concerns about the “de-skilling” of teachers, replacement of warm, alive and personalized mentoring, and the commodification of education, as human instructors are supplanted by automated digitalized computer systems that prioritize impersonal standardization over real authentic creativity, critical thinking and genuine reflection or reflexivity.

Moreover, the integration of Artificial Intelligence in our present educational institutions poses profound technological challenges, ranging from infrastructure and resource constraints to issues of digital/information divide and access inequality to those students who do not have access to these AI programs and applications (apps). In order to fully harness the potential of AI to transform education, investments must be made in digital infrastructure, teacher training, and educational resources to ensure equitable and accessible AI-driven educational opportunities for all learners and mentors alike. Furthermore, efforts must be made to bridge the digital divide and address disparities in access to technology and internet connectivity, particularly in marginalized and economically disadvantaged teachers and students whose access to AI-powered educational tools, programs, and apps may be limited or non-existent.

From a sociological perspective, the integration of Artificial Intelligence in our contemporary educational institutions reshapes social dynamics and power structures within educational institutions, raising questions about the role of technology in mediating interpersonal relationships and shaping social interactions.

As AI-driven algorithms influence decision-making processes related to student admissions, academic performance, and career pathways, concerns arise about the potential for algorithmic discrimination and bias to perpetuate and exacerbate existing inequalities based on race, gender, socioeconomic status, religious, and other demographic factors. Additionally, the reliance on AI-mediated communication channels and virtual learning environments may erode the sense of community and interpersonal connection in educational activities that is integral to the educational experience, leading to feelings of isolation and disengagement among students and educators alike.

From both existential and spiritual frameworks, the integration of Artificial Intelligence in our present educational system confronts us with innermost questions about the nature of human consciousness, human creativity, and the pursuit of truth in an increasingly digitalized and computerized world. As AI algorithms mimic human behaviors and generate content with ever greater efficiency, the boundaries between human and machine, genuine and artificial, real and virtual blur in so many ways that challenge our understanding of what it means to be human and what Reality truly is. In the face of AI-generated content and virtual experiences, profound questions arise about the authenticity and integrity of human expression, as well as the spiritual dimensions of learning and knowledge acquisition that transcend the limitations of technology. As educators and learners grapple with these existential and spiritual challenges, they are called upon to cultivate a deeper awareness of the interconnectedness of all beings and the sacredness of the learning process and our journey to the search for Knowledge, Truth, and Reality.

One final but very crucial point: the integration of Artificial Intelligence in our contemporary educational system gives rise to a host of philosophical, analytical, critical, reflective and cautionary questions that demand careful consideration and thoughtful engagement from all educational stakeholders. By confronting the ethical, legal, pedagogical, technological, sociological, existential, and spiritual challenges posed by AI in education, both learners and mentors can work together towards harnessing the transformative potential of AI to create more inclusive, equitable, and empowering learning environments for both students and teachers. 

Only by navigating and embracing the complexities of AI in our present educational system with openness, justice, fairness, and equity can we trailblaze and traverse the ever-changing and ever-meandering landscapes of learning and ensure that the pursuit of genuine knowledge remains a deeply authentic human endeavor grounded in the values of truth, goodness, justice, and love: an authentic learning that is founded and built-up by genuine humanity, and engaged affective humaneness, and not merely a trivial learning coming from technologies that are separated from the human experience of Life and authentic Living.

*

Note to readers: Please click the share button above. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

Prof. Henry Francis B. Espiritu is Associate Professor-7 of Philosophy and Asian Studies at the University of the Philippines (UP), Cebu City, Philippines. He was Academic Coordinator of the Political Science Program at UP Cebu from 2011-2014, and Program Coordinator of Gender and Development (GAD) Office at UP Cebu from 2015-2016 and from 2018-2019. He is presently the Focal Point Faculty for Gender and Development in the University of the Philippines (UP) Cebu, College of Social Sciences. 

Prof. Espiritu’s research interests include Theoretical and Applied Ethics, Islamic Studies particularly Sunni jurisprudence (Sunni Fiqh), Islamic feminist discourses, Islam in interfaith dialogue initiatives, Islamic environmentalism, Classical Sunni Islamic pedagogy, the writings of Al-Ghazali on pluralism and tolerance, Islam in the Indian Subcontinent, Turkish Sufism, Ataturk Studies, Ottoman Studies, Genghis Khan Studies, Central Asian Studies, Marxian Political Thought, Muslim-Christian Dialogue, Middle Eastern Affairs, Peace Studies, Public Theology, Political Economy, The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence (AI), and Postmodernism in Philosophy.

He is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG) Canada.

Featured image source